Movie 29: Rescuers Down Under

RescuersduposterWhen I started this blog I was hoping I would be surprised by movies and really love something I had previously discounted.  Up until now that hadn’t really happened.  But I think Rescuers Down Under may finally be that moment!

Compare to the First-

What? You ask?   But, Rachel you hated The Rescuers how can you like the sequel?

Well, as it turns out there are a lot of reasons.  This is one of the few times in movies when a sequel is far superior to the original in every way.  I seriously can’t think of a single way I liked the original better.

My main problem with The Rescuers wasn’t the set up. It was the tone.  To me it had a mean spirit about it.  First of all, it starts off the movie with Penny already captured.  We don’t see her get abducted but just hear about it morosely from Rufus at the orphanage. We hear about how miserable and lonely Penny was and from the beginning it feels hopeless and sad.  There is never a moment where Penny is free from her kidnappers.   In Down Under there are extended sequences of Cody with Marahute the eagle before he is abducted which helps us feel more hopeful than a desperate message in a bottle.

We also get WAY more of Madusa in the original than we do of the villain Mcleach in Down Under . In fact, I would bet that Mcleach and Cody are in the same scene for less than 10 minutes of the finished film.  Mcleach actually isn’t in the movie all that much, and there is almost always a comic element to his scenes whether it is Joanna stealing his eggs or Frank and the other animals trying to break free.   (more to come on that later).  Wilbur gets more screne time than the villain.  Some may see that as a weakness but I need very little of Mcleach to know exactly who he is.

Mcleach is also not as emotionally cruel to Cody like Medusa is with Penny.  He tells him to shut up and tries to intimidate him but it is more procedural and less personal than in the original.  Plus, there is no tearjerker song telling Cody to be brave despite the evil he is among.   And Cody has a mother who loves him and is looking for him.  The loneliness the characters experience is not the same.

In the end it comes down to tone.  In the little writing I’ve done I have learned tone is huge.  Down Under is full of light and hope where The Rescuers felt dark and cruel.  Again, this is just my opinion but that’s how the two came across to me.

So let’s actually talk about the movie instead of comparing to the original…


For some reason Disney had wanted to make a sequel to The Rescuers for some time.  In fact, Oliver and Company was supposed to be a continuation of Penny with her adopted family.  That was eventually scrapped and around 1988 production started on The Rescuers Down Under.

At the time there was an Australian trend with movies such as Crocodile Dundee being popular.  In the dvd extras Disney animators went to Australia and spent time at the San Diego zoo to get the feel for the animals and it is definitely the most life-like animals since Bambi. Marahute is stunningly drawn.


Although it is often forgotten (even by me!), Rescuers Down Under was important because it was the first film to use all CAPS (Computer Animation Production System).  This was developed by Pixar and instead of xerox which had been used since 101 Dalmatians copying the cells, the computer scanned the drawings and colored them in digitally.  The CAPs work in this movie is stunning.  Compared to the sketch xerox era it is so alive with color and movement.  Even more so than Little Mermaid.

There is also CGI in the movie which is completely created on the computer and that does not hold up as well.  Segments like the Sydney Opera House look dated when I bet when they were released it was pretty spectacular.

This kind of computer look of the opera house and the ocean turning purple and flat doesn't hold up well
This kind of computer look of the opera house and the ocean turning purple and flat doesn’t hold up well

But these scenes are few and far between.  Most look fabulous.

The voice cast is excellent.  Bob Newhart and Eva Gabor (her final role. I met her right around this time in the Beverly Hills Hilton and she was exactly you would think she would be. Even had a fir and hat like Bianca!) returns as Bernard and Bianca and both of them are given more to do in this telling.  Bernard isn’t a total bore but actually does things to propel the story and there are lots of terrific side characters.

My favorite was Wilbur who is the albatross brother of Orville from the first film.  John Candy does the voice work and he is hilarious.  There are repeated scenes where he is in this mouse operation clinic where I laughed about as hard as I have in a long time .  It’s a shame Candy didn’t do more voice-over work because he is so good.

The other interesting thing about the film is it is only the 2nd Disney film with no songs.  The first being The Black Cauldron.  The rest of the Disney Renaissance pictures would be full on musicals but Rescuers doesn’t even have a song in the credits, and you know I’m actually ok with it, which is surprising with how much I love musicals.

They were clearly going for an Indiana Jones vibe with Rescuers Down Under and in every way they succeeded including Bruce Broughton’s John Williamesque score.  I loved it! Here’s the closing number.  Listen to it and see if you don’t hear the Indiana Jones feel:

There is even a map with arrows just like in Indiana Jones:

mapAnd the kangaroo rat Jake has an Indiana Jones feel about him except he isn’t scared of snakes!

jake mapOne of the animators said they were trying to share the message that “someone small can conquer evil” and that really comes through.  What a great message for kids who are of course little.

It’s a shame it didn’t do better at the box office because it is routinely ignored by Disney and its fans.  It had the bad luck of opening the same weekend as Home Alone which monopolized the family audiences leaving Rescuers with 4th place.  Jeffrey Katzenberg pulled all marketing for the picture after that and it was left to the wayside.

The only good thing which came out of it is Disney decided to not release any of the sequels they would produce in theaters.  The direct to video sequels by Disney are one of the grossest cash grabs ever perpetrated by the studio.

The Story-

Like I said, it actually takes a while for the abduction and crime to happen (at the 13 minute mark).  Before that we meet Cody who lives with his Mother in the Australian outback, which looks a lot like a lush Grand Canyon.  The vistas are magnificently drawn.


Cody is notified by some of his network of animal friends that a creature is in trouble.  When he arrives he finds out it is a magnificent golden eagle called Marahute.  At  first Marahute is suspicious of Cody, but he is kind and cuts the ropes that bind her which thrusts him off the cliff.  In a very dramatic scene Marahute rescues Cody and gives him the ride of his life.

When the ride is done Cody notices a small mouse tied up and not realizing it is a trap tries to free it.  When he does he gets thrust into a pit and we meet Mcleach who is voiced by George C Scott.  He is a greedy poacher something Cody is eager to accuse him of.  Still he is willing to let Cody go until he see’s a golden feather from Marahute on his backpack.

featherMcleach also has his pet ‘goana’ or giant lizard named Joanna.  She is constantly fixated on eating eggs. evil lizardWanting Marahute, McLeach takes Cody and throws his backpack to the crocodiles to throw off the rangers who will search for him.  The mouse who was the bait on the trap see’s the abduction and sends word to the Rescue Aid Society.  This fun scene almost reminded me of an international version of the Twilight Bark from 101 Dalmatians.

Eventually Bernard and Bianca are assigned to the case but it interrupts Bernhard’s proposal to Bianca.  This scene of the mice restaurant reminds me of classic Disney short.

The animation is also fabulous with the snow coming down in the background (think of the original with the static backgrounds that looked so corny.  Quite the contrast!)

So off they go to find Albatross Air but it turns out it is no longer Orville but his brother Wilbur and like I said every scene with him is hilarious.  In an homage to the original we get another rocky take off which is a lot of fun.

His arrival in Australia is equally funny.

Bernard and Bianca meet Jake in this scene and he agrees to be their guide.  This is also where Wilbur get’s taken to the mouse hospital which is so funny.

Then we get the scariest scene in the movie with McLeach trying to get information from Cody using knifes.  This is the closest the film gets to the tone of the Rescuers but it is about a minute long so it is more palatable.

knifesBefore you know it we are back to Bernard and Bianca with Bernard trying to propose again, but he is interrupted by Jake and  a snake.

Cody is then put into a cage downstairs with the rest of the animals Mcleach has poached including a cellmate lizard named Frank.


This is another character that keeps things light and fun when they could be dark and disparaging.   The gang tries to get the key from the wall to set themselves free but Joana catches them and destroys their attempt putting the key back.

We then get another funny scene of Wilbur in the hospital.  Maybe you guys won’t think it is a good scene but it really made me laugh

We also get a humorous scene with Joana stealing Mcleach’s eggs and he gets the idea of how to manipulate Cody.  The next morning he pretends to let Cody go but tells him he has killed Marahute and ‘too bad about those eggs…’.  Knowing Cody will go to the eggs he follows him with Bernard and Bianca on the tank/truck contraption he is driving.

There is a scene that is right out of the tank scene from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade which was released in 1989. I have to believe this was added or changed to be an homage to that scene they are so similar but in a good way!

What kid isn’t going to like that kind of adventure?  There is nothing about Rescuers Down Under that is going to scare kids, make them nervous around strangers like the Rescuers did for me at 9 years old.

Mcleach traps Marahute but Bernard is left behind with the eggs.  He cleverly hides them from Joanna and just then Wilber shows up.  He says he will not sit on the eggs but there he is at the end of the scene.

Now that Mcleach has Marahute he needs to ‘tie up the loose ends’ meaning get rid of Cody.   All the hope lies in Bernard saving the day.  Jake doesn’t think he can do it but Bianca believes in him ‘you don’t know Bernard like I do.  He will never give up’ .  I like this moment of faith in a tiny mouse under such odds.  It goes with the theme the animators were trying to achieve.

To everyone’s relief Bernard does save the day and turn off Mcleach’s truck and causing him to be thrown into the river.

Marahute saves Cody and before another minute has gone by Bernard proposes to Bianca and she accepts creating our happy ending .


with one final word from Wilber sitting on the nest (I just love that guy!).

Wilber sitting on eggsMovie Review/Conclusion-

This movie is the reason why you should always go into a film with an open mind.  Even if you didn’t care for the original, maybe they will fix the problems in the sequel? It’s rare but it does happen, and it happens with Rescuers Down Under.  I loved it!

The voice acting is fabulous.  The comic relief is hilarious.  The Indiana Jones moments are great fun.  The side characters like Jake and Frank are developed and a delight to watch.  The music is perfect even without any songs!

Some of the animation looks a little dated but it is only a shot here, and a shot there.  Most of it looks gorgeous.  The flying scenes totally hold up.  The characters look so much more alive and vibrant than the original and more than anything we had seen in previous films (yes, even more fleshed out and illuminated than Little Mermaid).

The villain is a mean dude but you hardly get any of him, which is perfect.  We know he is a bad guy.  We don’t need to dwell in it till it becomes shrill and unpleasant.  He’s in and out and done.  Maybe not the greatest Disney villain ever but it works for the story.

Bernard and Bianca were a lot of fun this time around, and we got to see way more personality from both, especially Bernard who saves the day!   I loved that.

And Wilber is my new favorite.  He was so funny I could watch his scenes over and over again laughing each time.  The crazy doctors almost reminded me of a Pinky and the Brain skit.  That’s how funny they were.

So, I don’t know if going in with low expectations made this work for me but whatever it is I really liked it.   I can’t imagine a kid not loving this movie.

Overall Grade- A

19 thoughts on “Movie 29: Rescuers Down Under

    1. I certainly wasn’t expecting to like it so much but I guess sometimes low expectations can be a movies best friend. :). I dug it!

  1. I think it is a matter of taste which movie is better. One is more a detective story, the other an action adventure. I gravitate more towards the first one, but I get why other people prefer the second one. I guess I might too, if they had not left so many plot threats just dangling and hadn’t reduced Bianca to some sort of trophy.

    1. I think you are right. The second one has the john candy stuff too which I think gave me the biggest laugh of any Disney so far. But yeah different taste. I didn’t see the big difference in Bianca except she was about to be proposed to. She seemed basically the same eager to help, caring, believing person in both. But I will read your piece tonight when I can give it time.
      I agree though it is kind of a difference in mystery vs action adventure and I suppose I like the latter better. Hadnt thought of it that way

  2. Well I completely disagree with the Rescuers Down Under being better than The Rescuers, but like Swanpride said, it has a lot to do with personal taste.

    I just think this film is personally decent at best. The plot is a rehash of the first one, but it has a lot more gimmicks, bad pacing, and the characters were not as strong as they once were. The soundtrack is brilliant, and I am a welcome of the CAPS system. To each their own, and I do understand why some (and you) dislike The Rescuers. This film is just too much of a joke to me.

      1. actually, you are in the majority. From what I have seen on the internet about the two films, The Rescuers Down Under is the one that people think is better and more likable.

      2. Yes! Love being in the majority 😉

        I still say the Wilbur, crazy mouse doctor scenes made me laugh harder than any time in this project. Just hit my funny bone I guess. It was kind of like an animaniacs skit and I love them.

        I was thinking about it and in some ways RDU has a similar vibe as How to Train Your Dragon. Both are about boys. Both action adventure stories. Both have darker and comedic elements and both have flying scenes and bonding with a creature/animal . No wonder I liked it 😉

  3. Most people say this is a rare sequel rather than the original. I disagree with you in that I think the original did have hope that showed in “Tomorrow Is Another Day” and “Someone’s Waiting For You” and conveyed genuine emotion. This sequel is to me just a typical Hollywood-style adventure that conveys no real emotion except carefree joy and thrills when that’s the last way we should react to scenarios like Cody getting kidnapped and abused. One thing I’ll point out is that you literally could not get away with portraying a girl getting kidnapped and abused in this tone, and I have to ask how offended you would be if they did attempt that.

    One place we can agree is the scenes with Wilbur. Orville was amusing, good comic relief in the original. Wilbur is hilarious, and I remember watching this movie with my dad, the scenes with him in the hospital were our favorite and I laughed at them many times.

    1. I agree with you they probably couldn’t get away with the knife scene with a girl. I guess the difference for me is the knife scene is about a minute. We get so much less of the villain in this. Enough to know he is a bad dude but not pounded into our heads. We also know Cody has a mother who loves him where the original has Rufus and the sad story of Penny making it all too sad. I was also older when I saw this so it didn’t have the negative impact of the original on me personally as a child.

      As you will see from some of my other reviews I have a weakness for action adventure B Summer movie films like Indiana Jones, Goonies, even National Treasure so that’s part of my enjoyment of this.

      Finally, I also have a weakness for movies where characters fly. I love it! So the Marahute eagle scenes were a big win for me in this one

      I’m glad you enjoyed the hospital scenes. John Candy is so funny. I laughed my head off at that.

      Swanpride mentioned that the first is more of a mystery/detective story and this is more action adventure and I suppose I usually go for the latter but I see what you are saying. I guess I was willing to embrace the violence in this little more because it was a brighter looking film, Cody is almost never alone and without support and McLeach isn’t in the movie that much.

      But I’m glad you enjoyed the original and found something to make you laugh in this one. The great thing about Disney is there is something for everyone!

  4. I just watched ‘The Rescuers Down Under’ for the first time – while I haven’t seen the first one from the 70’s, I don’t think I want to! This movie was awesome!! It was fun, funny, tugged at the heartstrings, and most of the familiar Disney tropes felt natural to the story! Above all; it was stunning to behold!! Certainly some of the best 2D animation I’ve seen in years!!

    If I do have any criticisms, I kinda wish that the story wrapped up a bit better; it ends with the heroes flying off into the sky and the baby eagles hatching, I kinda wanted to see a bit more of Bernard and Bianca and seeing Cody return to his mother. And, honestly I would have traded some of the Wilbur in hospital scenes for seeing the three mice cross the outback. But hey, when a movie leaves you relentlessly wanting more after its done, that can’t be a bad sign!

    1. It really is such a hidden gem. It’s got a little bit of everything. It’s funny, romantic, gorgeous, and an Indiana Jones for kids. I love it about as much as I hate the original. I’m glad you love it too!

Leave a Reply