Ranking All of My 20 TIFF Movies

Last month I had the privilege of attending the TIFF (Toronto International Film Festival) as press. This was my 2nd time attending the festival and I’m so grateful to have had the opportunity to attend. It was a challenging time for me because it was the same time that my channel was hacked and disabled. This meant I couldn’t cover the festival in the same way I had the previous year with out of theater reactions on my channel and such but it was a welcome distraction to everything that was happening in my life. I ended up seeing 20 films (I was there from Sunday to Friday.)

Here is my ranking of those 20 films (I didn’t really have anything I hated although some I didn’t go fresh on)

20. Love of Your Life- this was actually my first movie of the festival. It’s ok as a romantic weepie but particularly the husband character was painted as so perfect that it hurt the realism. Still if you want to watch beautiful people in beautiful places it delivers on that front.

19. Sunburn- this is well done. It’s just not my style of indie. There isn’t much plot here and the acting isn’t the best but I do appreciate the tone is positive which isn’t always the case for stories set in the inner-city.

18. The Idiot(s)- I love Johnny Flynn and it was fun to see him at the festival but this  is kind of a mess. It is about Dostoyevsky and his wife but then has modern moments but does so inconsistently. The tone is also all-over-the-place. Also his selfish gambling makes it hard to root for him in any way or find it funny.

17. Back in Black– this s a one joke movie of the mortician who needs more dead people so his granddaughter decides to help him with this problem. It’s ok but nothing memorable.

16. Ink- I have to admit my feelings on Ink have sunk lower the more time I have had to think about it. This tale of Rupert Murdock and Larry Lamb has an energy to it I enjoyed and the performances are good. The problem is it all feels undercooked. Everything feels like it was almost special but didn’t quite make it. In particular the second half revolving around a  kidnapping feels like a different movie. I hope they remove the AI. It was so unnecessary.

15. Babies- there is some humor that works quite well in Babies and I’m sure some childless by choice couples will feel seen by it. Unfortunately it also feels a bit out of touch with the extreme privilege of its characters. Seth Rogen and Anna Kendrick have the luxury to act like child care would be a given and they just happen to live in an LA mansion. That kind of annoyed me.

14. Bitter Christmas- Pedro Almodóvar’s latest feels very personal diving into the heart of a writer and what it’s like to create a story. Here you have a director writing a screenplay and that story also taking place. It feels a little more forgettable from Almodóvar but entertaining with terrific lead performances.

13. A Talent for Murder- in this fun mystery Helen Mirren plays Patricia Highsmith in a fictional portrayal (but evidently she was a very strange personality in real life) that’s entertaining. Alden Ehrenreich has come to Switzerland to try and convince Highsmith to write another The Talented Mr Ripley novel but she is resistant to say the least. The story-within-a-story is less compelling but Mirren is great and the back and forth with Ehrenreich is a good time.

12. Tangles- I can’t completely review this because the projector broke and I couldn’t stay for it to be fixed because of my plane flight so I only watched the beginning. Still a sweet and tender story that I look forward to watching in completion soon.

11. Elsinore- bio-pics were all the rage at the festival and Elsinore is a bit of a mixed bag. Andrew Scott is terrific as actor Ian Charleson who wants to play Hamlet before he dies of AIDS. I wish the script was stronger. The dialogue often feels inauthentic particularly for Olivia Coleman’s character. Still it’s moving and worth seeing for Scott’s performance.

10. Tenzing- It’s nice to see a movie like Tenzing about driven but genuinely good people. It tells the story of Tenzing Norgay and Sir Edmund Hillary who ascended Everest for the first time in 1953. This doesn’t reinvent the wheel but it is inspiring with likable performances and characters. The kind of movie my Dad would love.

9. The Stunt Driver– this tells the story of Ken Carter who was basically Canada’s Evil Knievel (who is a character in the film.) He wants to jump his car over a lake and this is a goal over many years. Jay Baruchel brings warmth to Carter who is a pretty selfish character. Ed Helms plays an engineer helping him build the car. I thought given the cast it was going to be funnier but still enjoyed it.

8. The Debut- I must admit I was a little disappointed this isn’t more of a traditional musical (it advertised original music and lyrics in the trailer but very few to be found) but aside from that it is entertaining. Julianne Moore is Oscar-worthy as mousy housewife who becomes a bit overzealous in her first role in her local community theater. I wish they had used the Broadway cast more but it is sweet and funny.

7. In Waves- this is an animated bio-pic about an artist that meets a girl who teaches him the joys of surfing. It is a romantic weepie but it feels genuine and touching. The animation is beautiful and the sound design/voice performances are excellent. It was neat to be seated in front of the girl’s real life family and hear how much she sounded like her.

6. Julian- another animated film. This one from Cartoon Saloon but a different environment than they normally use with young Julian going to visit his Grandmother in Brooklyn and learning they are a family of mermaids. Delightful

5. Your Mother, Your Mother, Your Mother- this reminded me a lot of last year’s One Battle After Another. Fans of that film will enjoy this. They are both about Dads in violent situations still trying to take care of their kids. In this case it is Mahershala Ali trying to find breast milk for his baby. Some times the tone can be a little wonky but I overall enjoyed it. Great action and it endears us to Ali’s character given he’s trying to help his baby.

4. Resident Evil– now this technically was not part of the festival but it was part of my festival experience so I’m counting it. I wanted to make connections with new PR people and the studios so when I found out Resident Evil screening was happening in Toronto I had to go. Fortunately it proved to be a super fun movie with creative setpieces like a maternity ward I wont soon forget. It also had very silly jump scares and dialogue that kept me laughing throughout.

3. Being Heumann– I did a full review of this film and talked about my disabled experience at the festival (read here.) This a crowd pleasing portrayal of the 1977 sit-in for disability rights at a federal building in San Francisco. I honestly didn’t know anything about this sit-in, and I appreciate it doesn’t portray the activists as paragons of virtue. They have flaws like anyone else. Also nice to have actual disabled individuals playing these characters.

2. Wild Horse Nine- I’m actually not the biggest Martin McDonagh fan. I don’t dislike his films but usually don’t love them as much as everyone else. This film, however, I thoroughly enjoyed. I love the friendship story with Sam Rockwell and John Malkovich having great chemistry together. The banter is first rate.

1. I Play Rocky– some may see this as a unsophisticated top pick but at the end of the day I go to the movies to be entertained and that’s what this film is. I loved learning how Rocky was made and Anthony Ippolito is uncanny as young Sylvester Stallone. It’s crowd pleasing and a ton of fun seeing how everything came together for one of my favorite movies. I can’t wait for everyone else to see it!

So there you go! The ranking of all 20 movies I saw at TIFF. Like I said, it was a stressful time because my channel was hacked but I’m grateful to have had the distraction and to have seen so many terrific films. Thanks to TIFF for inviting me and I look forward to next year.

 

Blind Spot 128: Mr Bug Goes to Town

Each year for Blind Spot Project I try and pick at least one animated film I haven’t seen before. However, given this is my 10th year doing the project and given the number of animated films I watch the my list of blind spots for the medium is getting smaller. This is why I am so thrilled to have found a hidden gem this year: Mr Bug Goes to Town.

I had never heard of this film before the blind spot project, but I had heard of the Fleischer Brothers and had seen Gulliver’s Travels. Now that I’ve seen Mr Bug I’m not sure why it is not more highly praised in the animation community. What a sweet, entertaining and visually stunning animated film. I enjoyed it a lot more than I was anticipating.

We were a little late in posting the podcast episode for September because of my channel being hacked but I’m so glad I got a chance to see this film. The animation is great with beautiful watercolor backgrounds and impressive movement especially in scenes like when Mr Bug gets electrocuted.

Have you seen Mr Bug Goes to Town? I highly recommend it!

Blind Spot 127: Once Upon a Time in America

Hi everyone! I am very excited to tell you that my youtube channel is back up and running after being terribly hacked. In all the chaos I never posted my August blind spot episode I did with Molly. It was on Once Upon a Time in America– the classic gangster movie by director Sergio Leone.

Like most mob movies this film is very long and I found the pacing to be strangely done but I’m glad I saw it the one time. It has stunning production values and the acting is good. I particularly admire how they matched the young and old versions of the characters so perfectly. The music by Ennio Morricone is classic and the narrative does keep one guessing with the time shifts and the reveals throughout.

These kind of movies aren’t really my favorite but again I’m glad I saw it the one time and would recommend it to anyone who likes mob movies.

My patrons keep me honest and able to see and review as much as I do. Make sure you check out the patreon for perks, exclusive reviews and to be part of our monthly events and watch alongs. If you value honest criticism check it out. Find out more here.

New rom-com The Love Hypothesis actually improves upon the book (Review)

In the world of movies there is the accepted adage that ‘the book is always better’ meaning movies are usually lesser forms of the stories told in the books they are adapting. However, there are exceptions to this rule and the recent adaptation of The Love Hypothesis is such an example. Perhaps that is helped by the novel in question being Reylo Star Wars fan fiction to begin with but I enjoyed this film more than the novel.

I have now read 2 of author Ali Hazelwood’s novels and I had the same problem with both books. She is too worried with her characters being non-problematic that they come across as phony with the dialogue feeling therapy coded and inauthentic. In The Love Hypothesis the characters are entering into a contract for fake dating but practically every conversation feels like it was pre-approved by the character’s shrinks rather than the clumsy awkward way humans actually talk.

I’m not saying I don’t want respect and consent to be a thing but I also don’t want to be reading a romance about robots who always say the right thing at the right time. This is particularly true for Hazelwood’s characters who are young college age or in this case graduate students. Like I said The Love Hypothesis gets a little bit of a pass because it started as Reylo fan fiction so it wasn’t meant to be a serious novel but when multiple books have this same problem it’s a turn off.

Anyway, back to the movie… in the adaptation by Sarah Rothschild, directed by Claire Scanlon, they take the story of the novel and minimize the therapy talk making it a part of flirty banter of the nerdy scientists. It also helps they have 2 leads in Tom Bateman and Lili Reinhart who have sizzling chemistry together. I also appreciate the little winks to Reylo in the direction (having Adam in all black, the way he walks, enters a room, the music playing at certain moments are a lot of fun.)

The plot is of course ridiculous but I must admit I’m a sucker for the fake dating trope. It almost always works for me. Also grumpy guy and sunshine girl is another favorite trope (and a favorite of almost every Hazelwood novel.) The movie is about 30 minutes longer than it needs to be (I really think these types of rom-coms are best at the 80-90 minute mark but maybe that’s just what I’ve been acclimated to with the Hallmark  formula films?)

That said, if you like a rom-com with witty banter between leads with good chemistry you’ll fall in love with The Love Hypothesis. Certainly if you liked the book you’ll love this film. It is on the spicy side like the book so be forewarned but it’s also a sexy, fun good time.

My patrons keep me honest and able to see and review as much as I do. Make sure you check out the patreon for perks, exclusive reviews and to be part of our monthly events and watch alongs. If you value honest criticism check it out. Find out more here.

Being Heumann review and was I a disabled critic at TIFF?

This year at the Toronto International Film Festival one of the big themes was the bio-pic. Of the 20 films I saw at the festival 9 are at least semi-biographical or based on true events. One of the best of this group is from Oscar winner Sian Heder entitled Being Heumann. This is a crowd-pleasing story that had me thinking about my own life and even my experience needing some disability assistance at the festival.

I feel some degree of hesitancy in describing myself as a disabled critic or claiming to relate to the experiences portrayed in Being Heumann. Part of that is probably some internalized ableism but also because I know that my need for assistance is largely self-imposed. I can hear the people saying that getting help climbing stairs or waiting in line is enabling my obesity and how can I claim to relate to the experiences of people who are born with a disabled body? Even now as I write I can hear those voices in my head and feel conflicted about what my response is.

I guess I would say that disability is not necessarily a life-long condition. For example, if I break my leg and am on crutches nobody would disagree that I would be disabled and in need of assistance at that time. It’s the same with my body at the moment. Also not participating in the world because of my current body is not motivating or empowering to change my body. If anything participating in things like TIFF make it more likely to help me overcome the challenges my body faces.

At the end of the day, my body is what it is, and I needed help to participate. This is what’s important about Being Heumann. While there is inspiration to be found in the story of disability activist Judy Heumann, the point of the film is more subtle. Judy and her fellow protesters aren’t trying to be inspirational figures. They are just trying to enter buildings, move through rooms and communicate with their fellow humans. This seems like the most basic of expectations for a community to insist upon for all of its citizens and yet as the movie demonstrates this humanity had to be fought for.

One of the special parts about Being Heumann is all of the disabled roles are played by disabled actors. This usually isn’t the case with Hollywood and it gives an authenticity that adds a lot to the film. Judy is played by Ruth Madeley and she brings the right level of feistiness to the role while still having her share of flaws. I also appreciate the script allows her to be sexy while never feeling patronizing or inauthentic to her experience. I could even picture some leaving the film feeling like Judy is unlikable, but I actually think that is a good thing. The script allows her to have tunnel vision at times with even Judy having to accept the limitations caused by the disabilities of those she’s working with and fighting for. This is so much more effective than if she was portrayed as some kind of paragon of virtue.

I also appreciate the film is narrow in its focus. Instead of trying to portray Judy’s whole life or the disability rights movement it centers on the protests in 1977, which I was honestly unfamiliar with. I was aware of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) passed in 1990 but had never heard of the sit-in that occurred in 1977 at the Federal Building in San Francisco. This year has been a great year for films inspiring me to learn more about history including Young Washington and The Uprising, and I would put Being Heumann in this group.

If the film has weaknesses it is with Mark Ruffalo and his portrayal of Joseph Califano, secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. He is the one that must sign section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 which prohibited any entity that receives federal funding to discriminate against the disabled. Califano had to sign the regulations in order for them to go into effect and not go back into the cycle of congressional legislation (President Carter is kept completely clean from any wrong-doing in this film.)

Anyway, the portrayal of Califano is unfortunately cartoonish and Ruffalo often feels like he is in a comedy when everything else is quite serious. It would be nice if the script gave him one moment of humanity where he recognizes the simple requests of the protesters but he’s nothing but a big doofus.

That portrayal aside, Being Heumann is a crowd-pleasing film that profiles an important movement in American history led by wonderful people like Judy Heumann. It does have R rated content, but I certainly think it is fine for teenagers or anyone who can handle some mature language and themes. I’m certainly glad I saw it, and am grateful that I live in a world where getting help with my own disabled experience, as minimal as it might be, is even a possibility. Thank you to Judy and others for fighting that fight.

Check out my friend Kristen Lopez’s new book Popcorn Disabilities to learn more about the portrayal of the disabled in film https://amzn.to/3VrzEwd (ad)

My patrons keep me honest and able to see and review as much as I do. Make sure you check out the patreon for perks, exclusive reviews and to be part of our monthly events and watch alongs. If you value honest criticism check it out. Find out more here.

Blind Spot 126: SubUrbia

I consider myself a big fan of director Richard Linklater. Whether it be his more ambitious projects like Boyhood or more mainstream efforts like School of Rock he’s almost always a director that captures authentic experience and entertains. When I was deciding what to focus on this year for blind spot I noticed an entry in his filmography I had never heard of called SubUrbia. Normally these blind spot picks are popular films, hence my missing them being a blind spot, but this choice is a rare underrated selection. I’m not sure why SubUrbia fell under the radar but I really enjoyed it.

One could easily group this some of Linklater’s other coming of age films like Slacker and Dazed and Confused (particularly both of those because they came out in the 90s) but I think SubUrbia has its own strengths that make it stand out. In particular the script feels like an entertaining play and that’s because it is based on a play by Eric Bogosian who adapted his own work for the big screen. Sometimes adapting a play can feel too performative but this manages to take Bogosian’s words and make it still feel authentic and real. In particular a character named Sooze played by Amie Carey seemed like every naive young person who wants to change the world in very vague ways that sound pretty but haven’t felt the cost of work and change.

Giovanni Ribisi plays the more cynical lead Jeff and he’s very good with Steve Zahn being a little grating but effective as the loser friend Buff. Nicky Katt is the caustic incel friend Tim who has a confrontation with a Pakistani convenience store owner Nazeer played by Ajay Naidu.

I had so much fun talking about SubUrbia with my friend Molly. I hope you enjoy the discussion (see above.) If you’ve seen the film let me know what you think and if you haven’t give it a shot. I’d say it’s definitely a hidden film gem from the 90s.

Blind Spot 125: Housesitter

Most of the time these Blind Spot picks I wouldn’t describe as underrated. The whole reason they are blind spots is they have a following whether it be a cult favorite or critical darling they are beloved by many. I’m honestly not sure why I selected the 1992 comedy Housesitter for Blind Spot because it doesn’t really have either of those things but I’m glad I did. What a fun and genuinely underrated rom-com of the 90s.

I had a great time talking about the film with my friend Ryan (see above) and what I think it does well is capturing the energy of the old screwball comedies of the 50s. A hallmark of these rom-coms is a lot of lying. Characters like Goldie Hawn’s in this movie start off with a lie and then keep piling onto it. This leads to a lot of great humor. Not only is there a lie but there is also a fake relationship which is another fun rom-com trope.

My main flaw with Housesitter is the Hawn and Steve Martin never have any chemistry making the ending feel unbelievable. I almost wish they had a little more guts for a subversive ending with them hating each other or making life miserable for each other. That would have been very funny. Still, I enjoyed the ride the film had to offer even without the amazing chemistry.

Check out our Blind Spot episode for more of a deep dive, and we have a fun episode coming up in July about Richard Linklater’s Suburbia.

My patrons keep me honest and able to see and review as much as I do. Make sure you check out the patreon for perks, exclusive reviews and to be part of our monthly events and watch alongs. If you value honest criticism check it out. Find out more here.

Tribeca 2026: Young Washington

I’ve always been a big fan of historical films. Even when they are a little fast and lose with the truth (Braveheart I’m talking to you) often they inspire me to do the actual research on the historical figures and that’s a fun experience to take part in. I particularly love American history especially in places I’ve been to and lived in. The latest example that is premiering at Tribeca Film Festival is Young Washington about the formative early years of our first president George Washington. Not only did this movie inspire me to learn more about Washington but I found it thoroughly entertaining as a piece of blockbuster filmmaking.

To be honest, I have actually seen Young Washington 3 times already because I ended up doing 3 interviews which will be coming closer to the wide release on Hallmarkies Podcast. I also was so inspired by the movie that I wanted to learn more and read Ron Chernow’s captivating book (ad) called Washington: A Life. I highly recommend this book and the movie too!

Young Washington is directed by Jon Erwin and starts with Washington as a child after the death of his father when he was 11 and follows him through the French and Indian war, the disaster at Fort Necessity and Washington’s courageous stand with the Virginia Regiment in 1758. This was all done extremely effectively in the film. It’s particularly impressive with the small budget ($20-$35 million is what I read) I was especially impressed with the Fort Necessity sequence which was as captivating as it was devastating.

The cast Erwin has assembled is also excellent. William Franklyn-Miller is endearing and easy to relate with as Washington and he is surrounded by talent such as Mary-Louise Parker as his mother, Kelsey Grammar as Thomas Fairfax and Andy Serkis as Edward Braddock. The movie does expand on the truth with the romance Washington had with Sally Fairfax who in real life was the wife of one of his friends but it’s a small part of the film so not a big problem.

After reading Chernow’s book I am even more impressed with the historical accuracy of many of the scenes in Young Washington. Like I said, they don’t expand upon much and it also doesn’t feel like American propaganda. Afterall, we are seeing Washington at his greatest failure, literally surrendering because of partly his failure of leadership. His other weaknesses are mainly foibles of youth in the film but if anything that makes him easier to relate with than if he was portrayed as some paragon of virtue.

This summer we have the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence and I can’t think of a better way to celebrate such an event than watching Young Washington. Hopefully you’ll be as entertained by it as I was and it will also inspire you to learn more about Washington and other Founding Fathers. At the very least it’s a rousing reminder that even our greatest heroes start out as young men and women brimming with potential.

Covering festivals is not easy and small sites like Rachel’s Reviews need help to provide such extensive coverage of film and theatre. Make sure you check out the patreon for perks, exclusive reviews and to be part of our monthly events and watch-alongs. If you value honest criticism, check it out. Find out more here.

Tribeca 2026: Act One


One of the most ever-present questions about human nature is that of nature vs nurture. How much of who we are is innate to our beings and how much is pushed out of us by those that teach, parent and nurture us? Nobody knows for sure but at the very least teachers and others in authority can have power to draw us to different choices and convince us to go against our nature. This power has been explored in many films most recently in the Oscar winning film Whiplash. Now director Sophia Takal has taken Whiplash into the world of acting in her tight little thriller Act One.

Instead of drumming, in Act One we have acting as our talent of choice and young Hannah dreams of becoming a great actress. She wants to be a serious actress, and her mother is less than supportive of what she see’s as a silly career choice. Instead Hannah turns to an acting coach named Melanie who takes method acting to a whole new level. Melanie’s teaching is especially manipulative because she can defend anything as the cost of getting into character. Anyone who doesn’t participate fully is not as committed to the roles and the transformative experience of becoming a character. Of course this is a ridiculous reason to participate in toxic even criminal behavior but then again Hannah is young and inexperienced (even more so than Andrew in Whiplash who was at least in college.)

The main strength of this film is in Takal’s script. We can all relate to the draw of perfecting ones art and the intoxicating appeal of just the right kind of praise. Controlling people often know what to say to get insecure people to make one small step down the road of dedication to their cult. This is made even more powerful when fellow drama class member becomes Hannah’s sexual partner and Melanie uses that vulnerability to gain more power over her students.

Oddly enough in a movie about acting the performances in Act One are probably the weakest aspect. Ella Beatty plays Hannah and she captures the mousy nature of the character but Ari Graynor was less convincing as Melanie. The rest of the performances are more amateur in feel but as the movie is about amateur actors I suppose it fits well enough.

Still, like I said, the script is where this film shines as I was enthralled to see what was going to happen to Hannah next and if she would get out of this maddening spiral. Act One is playing June 10, 12, 13th at the festival and worthy of your time.

Covering festivals is not easy and small sites like Rachel’s Reviews need help to provide such extensive coverage of film and theatre. Make sure you check out the patreon for perks, exclusive reviews and to be part of our monthly events and watch-alongs. If you value honest criticism, check it out. Find out more here.