Pixar Review 33: Monsters University

mu19I can hardly believe it but this marks the last of my Pixar series! (Well, until Good Dinosaur comes out that is).  Today we will talk about Pixar’s 2013 effort Monsters University.  It is of course a prequel to the beloved Monsters Inc.

Pixar has a philosophy with sequels that in an effort to not repeat the same movie over again they try to not only tell a different story but put it in a completely different genre.  If you think of the Toy Story movies all 3 are different genres (buddy movie, action adventure, prison escape). The same is true for the Cars movies (nostalgia small town story, spy movie).  They followed this tradition with Monsters University creating a college comedy instead of the mixture of themes we get in original film.

mu2But right out of the gate they make an interesting choice.  Instead of focusing on the hero and in many ways lead of Monsters Inc, Sulley, (he is the one with the relationship with Boo after all) they focus on the sidekick Mike. So how do you tell the sidekicks story?  It’s a tricky thing.

They start out with Mike as a little one going on a field trip to Monsters Inc.  He is inspired by the scarers and decides that is going to be his dream job.  He works hard and gets into Monsters University.  He follows the mantra we’ve seen in a thousand other movies- if you work hard at something you will succeed.

mu17But wait! Pixar decides to subvert this narrative and give us something very unique for a kids film.  The head of the school is named Dean Hardscrabble voiced by Helen Mirren.  She tells Mike he is not scary.  She knows no matter how hard he works he will never be scary. In some ways she is the villain of the picture but in others there is no villain.  There are just people being honest with Mike about who he is.

MONSTERS UNIVERSITYThey also show an interesting dynamic between Sulley and Mike.  Sulley is in  many ways the exact opposite of Mike.  Everything is easy for him.  He is naturally scary and doesn’t have to work hard to be successful.  Mike has his head in books while Sulley doesn’t even bring a pencil to class.  This causes animosity between the two at the start of the film.

But then the annual Scare Games are announced and Mike see’s it as his opportunity to prove he can be a great scarer and be allowed into the scare program.  In order to enter though he needs a fraternity and team.  Sulley needs a team so he ends up joining Mike’s fraternity which he assembles from castaways and nerds.

mu7The opponents in the Scare Games is a fraternity called Roar Omega Roar.  Nathan Fillion voices the leader of Roar frat.

mu9We also get to meet some of the other frats and sororities competing in the Scare Games.

mu15And that’s where we get into the goings-on of the Scare Games and the movie starts to lose me a little bit.  The various obstacles and challenges (cheating and sabotages included) aren’t that compelling for me.  And unfortunately it is a large part of the movie.

MONSTERS UNIVERSITYWithout spoiling it certain events happen that show Mike he is just not scary.  His dream was wrong.  That is a bold concept for a children’s movie to address.  But what he does realize is he is a great coach, a great leader.  He motivates everyone on his team to do better including Sulley.  That is his true gift.  In the end he is sad to give up the dream of scaring but he also seems happy to have found his true calling.  I love that message and I think it makes Mike one of the most complex characters in all of Pixar.

mu13Mike and Sulley also realize they can get where they want by working through the company of Monsters Inc- starting in the mail room and eventually hitting the scare floor.  That’s another very subversive message for a kids movie.  You don’t necessarily need to go to college to get where you want to go.  I love that!

mu18Monsters University also has a bright color palate that I find very pleasing.  Animation-wise it is a joy to watch.  All the voice cast is great including Billy Crystal, John Goodman, Helen Mirren, Nathan Fillion, Charlie Day, Aubrey Plaza, Julia Sweeney, Bonnie Hunt and more.

Overall, Monsters University is a very pleasant Pixar movie and one, like I said, that subverts traditional narrative quite a bit for the kind of story it is telling.  I really enjoyed that aspect of it.  It is creative, beautiful and I loved seeing Mike and Sulley’s back story.

However, it is far from perfect.  The Scare Games go on too long and I didn’t care much about them except for when the winners are declared.  At 104 minutes it is a pretty long film and I think 15 minutes could have been cut without missing much of anything.

mu3Also the side characters aren’t that memorable or interesting.  I didn’t hate them but just find them kind of forgettable.

That said, I do like Monsters University.  It challenges the traditional narrative just enough to keep my interest.  I think if you watch it with your kids they will have a good time.

There is some college partying gong on which some parents may be uncomfortable with and some tense moments to be aware of.  Also I don’t know how interested little kids will be with Mike’s job struggles?  Maybe I don’t know.

Randy Newman returns with a lovely score.  I was really impressed with how it sounded like a fight song from a University.  It had that big band collegiate fight song feel to it.

So Monsters University has it’s flaws but the uniqueness of Mike’s journey really rewards the viewer and makes you think about your dreams and life.  Maybe there is something better for you instead of settling for mediocrity just because it is your dream?  We are all good at different things but sometimes those talents take a little more digging for some than others.  Mike discovers what makes him special and I love seeing that take place.

Overall Grade- B-

What do you think of Monsters University?

Youtube Shoutout Matthew Aronhalt Top 200

Hey guys!  I just wanted to give a quick shoutout to a youtube friend of mine Matthew Aronhalt.  Over on his channel he is doing a Top 200 Favorite Films Countdown and I have been very impressed with it so far.  He has everything from recent hits like Gone Girl, to more obscure animation like Persepolis. I’m not saying I agree with him or his picks but I appreciate his reasoning and what he has put together. I would love to see him get more hits so if you have a chance check some of his videos out and show him some love.  I’m really looking forward to see how the list continues on. 🙂

Did the Right Film Win? 2006 Animated Oscars

Hey guys!  So 2005 was a very strong year.  Can’t say the same for 2006.  It is a very eclectic kind of strange group of nominees but they all have problems.

You all can read my thoughts on Cars here on the blog. It is a weird world of all Cars but if you can get past that it is a nice little movie with a good message about the loss of Main Street USA.  It looks great and the humor is well done.  It is definitely a little bit too long and drags in sections but I can see why kids love it.

Monster House was done by Image Movers and it has the pasty look of that studios films.  The animation in general I am not a big fan of .  Also, they made a mistake and had the movie go big in feel when it should have stayed small.  It turns into a Godzilla like film and it is so crass in its humor it didn’t work for me.  I can see why it has its fans but it just wasn’t for me.

Happy Feet is another strange offering.  It starts out so cheerful with the penguins singing and Mumbles dancing.  But then half way through they forget the singing and it turns into this message movie with the penguins going to tell the humans to stop over-fishing.  The last 30 minutes feel like a different movie.  It is also way too long.  But the enjoyable sections are very adorable and fun so not a total loss.

What are your thoughts?  I have loved the discussion this series has stimulated both on the channel and blog so thank you! If you like the video please give it a thumbs up.  Thanks!

Anastasia Review

This blog is from my column on ldsblogs.com. I would love if you guys checked that out. http://ldsblogs.com/30014/family-movie-night-anastasia

This week’s choice for Family Movie Night is the 1997 animated film Anastasia.  It is not a perfect but I find it very entertaining and I think your family will as well.

Anastasia was one of only two films from Fox Animation Studios which was formed in a merger with Sullivan Bluth Studios after their Thumbelina hadn’t done very well. Unfortunately neither of the films were big successes and they closed in 2000 but Anastasia has remained popular among animation fans and with good reason.

Directed by Don Bluth and Gary Goldman, Anastasia combines a real story with a fairytale feel, which is normally something I do not enjoy.  For instance, I have big problems with Disney’s Pocahontas.  The reason I think Anastasia fares a little bit better is most of the characters are fictitious where nearly all are real people in Pocahontas.  Plus in Anastasia the characters are a little more nuanced than the ‘natives good, white people bad’ you see in Pocahontas.   I don’t give it a complete pass on the inaccuracies but Anastasia does not make me as uncomfortable as other films.

What’s especially peculiar about Anastasia as source material is it is not about the princess but about the woman Anna Anderson who in the 1920’s claimed to be the princess.  It’s a strange place to start a story but it works as kind of a mystery.

Basically the plot starts when the Romanov family led by Tsar Nicholas are murdered by a military coup led by Rasputin.  This is done mostly in flashback and is not as scary or bloody as it sounds.  The youngest daughter Anastasia is rescued by a kitchen boy and flees the city.  Next, we jump ahead 10 years and Anya is an orphan who doesn’t remember who she was or where she came from.

Meanwhile the Dowager Empress Marie, Anastasia’s grandmother, has put out a reward for anyone who can find the princess.  Tempted by the prize, two con-men, Demitri and Vladimir, hold auditions Anastasia_Goldento find a princess they can pass off to Marie and get the money.  Anya stumbles upon them and naturally gets the part.  They begin training her on the ways of the royal family and house and start a road trip to Paris to meet with Marie.
Rasputin is naturally the villain in the picture and he is voiced by Christopher Lloyd.  His song ‘In the Dark of the Night’ is very well done even if it does look a lot like Be Prepared from The Lion King.  Rasputin in this version has sold his soul to the devil in order to remove the Romanov family from the earth, so deep is his hatred for them   Once he finds out Anastasia may be alive and going to meet her Grandmother he of course tries to kill her.  One especially dramatic sequence involves a train crash which is so well animated.

The animation in Anastasia is lush, vivid and beautiful.  I kind of wish Don Bluth hadn’t completely abandoned his signature more sketchy style but it cannot be denied how good the movie looks.  The plot is also tightly paced and engrossing.  They did a good job with the chemistry between Demitri and Anya and aside from a lame liar reveal subplot they are believable as a couple.

All the vocal performances are good except it is annoying to me that aside from Lansbury and Grammer nobody does their own singing.  In a film like this celebrity voices aren’t necessary.  They don’t add anything to the story and I think they should have just gone with the singers for all the vocals.  Let’s put it this way: nobody went to Anastasia to hear John Cusack’s vocal performance, so at best it is an unnecessary expense.

That said, the songs are the real standout to Anastasia.  It feels like a Broadway play and that is probably because they are written by Lynn Ahrens and Stephen Flaherty who have done many shows including Ragtime, Once on this Island and My Favorite Year.  In some cases the lyrics are actually stronger than Disney offerings such as Tarzan or Hercules (which I adore both).  The score is also good by David Newman.  I think if Anastasia had been a bigger hit they could have had a great Broadway musical out of it.

To see the rest of Rachel’s reviews, click here.

Overall, Anastasia ends up being a very entertaining animated film.  There is a nice heart to the picture and the romance really works.  The songs are well done and the animation is lush and vivid.  If you watch it with your family it might be a good chance to talk about some of the true history and the adaptation process within different mediums.  You can also discuss honesty, self-discovery and the importance of family.  In the end it will be a great choice for the entire family for Family Movie Night.

Overall Grade B

Did the Right Film Win? 2005 Animated Oscars

Today we get to one of the hardest years I think I will face in this analysis of the films nominated for Best Animated Academy Award each year.  I love all of the 3 films nominated and can see going with any of them.

Check out my video where I talk about the films and decide- did the right one win?  If you like the video give it a thumbs up.  Thanks!

Picking my favorite was difficult because they are all so strong.  In the end I went with Corpse Bride because I love the Danny Elfman music and being a lover of musicals that will always put a movie over the top.  I particularly like these 2 numbers.

What would you pick? Please put in the comments section. Thanks.  I’ve really loved this discussion on both  my channel and here on the blog from this series so thank you for contributing!

 

Did the Right Film Win? 2004 Animated Oscars

Continuing on with my series analyzing the Oscar nominated animated feature films each year I am at 2004.

I’d love if you could take a look at the video and if you like it give it a thumbs up.  It’s a bit longer than any of my other videos but I had lots to say on The Incredibles!

My thoughts on the other films is basically Shark Tale is a complete failure.  I didn’t like the animation. The lead character is a complete jerk.  The world building isn’t good.  They don’t look like fish and there are no bubbles.  Most importantly I didn’t laugh once.  I personally think Home on the Range was a better film that year! I had never seen Shark Tale before last night and I can see why I avoided it.

Shrek 2 I think is the strongest of the series.  It has the most interesting story, more of the jokes work and it has a pretty good villain.  I still have some of the same issues as Shrek and it could have been about 15 minutes tighter but it definitely deserves the nomination.  Oh and I did like the music especially Jennifer Saunders.

What do you think of 2004?  I’m guessing most of my readers will agree with me The Incredibles was the correct winner for the year.

Ranking the Pixar Shorts

pixar shorts collage2

So I finished reviewing all the Pixar shorts and had a blast.  Honestly there isn’t any that I dislike and I think the lowest score I gave is a B.

That said, them all being so great in a way made the task of ranking them a little bit tricky.  What is especially tough is how to do you gauge something that is a huge technical achievement like Luxo Jr against a visual storytelling delight like La Luna?  They are special in different ways.

I normally hate rubrics for scoring movies because I feel they can force you to give you grades or scores to things that don’t jive with your actual views and feelings.  Other people like them but  I couldn’t feel right about giving something a grade I don’t think it deserves.  Plus, I also don’t like that with a rubric there is no way to give a perfect score. I feel like the focus can become what are the problems instead of the overall great experience I had at a top-tier film. For other people it works but not for me.

However, in this case where I like them all but for different reasons,  it seemed like the best way to go.  So, here’s what I came up with.  Each short had the potential of 20 points- 5 for Technical Achievement, 5 for Story, 5 for Artistry and 5 for Overall Enjoyment.  You can see how each film worked out below points-wise.

pixar shorts

These are also only the original shorts.  I only reviewed 2 of the spin-off shorts based on or including characters from their feature films but I did not include either of them in my ranking.

All that said, here’s how I rank the shorts.  (You can find reviews of all these shorts here)

16. Adventures of Andre and Wally Badventures of wally315. Blue UmbrellaTHE BLUE UMBRELLA14. One Man Bandone man band213. Luxo

luxo12. Knick Knack

knick knack211. For the Birds

for the birds210. Lava

lava9. Day and Night

day and night38. Lifted

LIFTED7. Partly Cloudy

partly cloudy76. Tin Toy

tin toy5. Boundin’

boundin74. Red’s Dream

reds dream3. Presto

presto32. Geri’s Game

geris-game1. La Luna

la luna6But like I said they are all great so thanks to Pixar for such lovely works of art!

Pixar Review 32: The Blue Umbrella

blue umbrella3Well guys I did it!  With this review of The Blue Umbrella I will have seen and reviewed all the original Pixar shorts (that is until Sanjay’s Super Team comes out in November).  I hope you have enjoyed these reviews as shorts are too often ignored or forgotten by the average filmgoers.   I will post a ranking later this week of all the Pixar shorts but start thinking about what your favorites are and share in the comments below.

Anyway, back to the Blue Umbrella.  This is one of the Pixar shorts I would put in the ‘technology advancing’ category.   Like Luxo Jr or some of the early shorts the story is pretty simple but it is the animation which makes it stand out.  I think it is pretty safe to say it is the most realistic looking animation I’ve ever seen.blue umbrella4This photorealism  was a result of a new rendering system called Global Illumination and I think it could be very exciting for the future of CG animation.  I particularly wonder if they’ve used the technology in the new Jungle Book movie which I’ve heard from more than one source the trailer had the most realistic CG animals they’ve ever seen.

THE BLUE UMBRELLAThe Blue Umbrella is a simple story of a red and blue umbrella who fall in love and get separated on a rainy day in a big city.    That’s all there is to it.

The music by Jon Brion with Sarah Jaffe vocals adds a lot to the story because like most Pixar shorts there is no dialogue.

In many ways it is a lot like the hat short in Make Mine Music.  In my review of that I said “The whole thing is strange.  I can feel for ducks, mice, parrots but hats…”.  The same thing goes for umbrellas.  I guess I just don’t have that great of an imagination to get into umbrellas falling in love (or hats).

blue umbrella2But I do think the music in The Blue Umbrella is much better than the Andrews Sisters (they are fun but kind of corny).

That said, the animation is what is really special in this short.  It’s really quite stunning.  Here is a little clip of it to give you a feel:

What do you think of The Blue Umbrella?  What is your favorite Pixar short?

Overall Grade- B

Did the Right Film Win? 2003 Animated Oscars

Today I uploaded the next in my Animated Oscars: Did the Right Film Win series.  We are on to 2003 and we get 2 special films and one that I hate.

If you guys follow my blog you know I did not like Brother Bear.  You can read my full review to find out why I felt it made the wrong choice every time and got a rare F from me.

The two worthy nominees are Finding Nemo and The Triplets of Belleville.

Finding Nemo is the wonderful Pixar film about a father fish searching for his son who is in an aquarium miles away.  It is funny, creative, very well paced with beautiful seascapes.

The Triplets of Belleville is not for everyone.  It is challenging 2D animated film from Sylvain Chomet.  The story is about a woman who’s Grandson becomes a cyclist but then is abducted.  She meets a famous vaudville act The Triplets of Belleville who help her find her Grandson and sing a lot of catchy songs along the way.  There is no dialogue for the most part and it is very strange but I like it.  The animation is stunning and the music will make you want to dance.  It made my Most Artistic Animated Films list.

So what do you go with the artistic film with great music or the crowdpleaser with great heart and good jokes?  Watch the video and find out. 🙂

What would you pick? Would love your thoughts on if the right film won in 2003.