[REVIEW] ‘Maleficent: Mistress of Evil’

If you have been following this blog for any amount of time you know I am a tough critic when it comes to the Disney live action remakes. A few I like (Pete’s Dragon, Cinderella) but most are bland at best. However, there’s a special level of hatred in my heart for 2014’s supposed reinterpretation of Sleeping Beauty called Maleficent. I hated pretty much every decision that film made, so you can imagine my hesitancy when they announced a sequel for this year, Maleficent: Mistress of Evil. But I pride myself on keeping an open mind for EVERY film. So, I went to see it today, and left with surprisingly mixed feelings.


First, let’s talk about the positives. Maleficent: The Mistress of Evil is not a cash grab. It is obvious the creators tried their best to improve upon the original film in almost every way. To begin with, the production design is far better. The original felt like a bland CGI world I’ve seen a million times. In contrast, this film has beautiful cinematography and world building, which felt fresh and original. I particularly loved a long sequence in a nest where everything was monochromatic: filled with beautiful grays and whites woven as background for the bat-like Maleficent. Also, all of the costumes and make-up were stunning. Some of the best I’ve seen all year.

For the first act of the movie I was actually digging the film. It starts out as a fantasy version of Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, which was weird and different. As opposed to the original, which felt like an apology and bastardization of Sleeping Beauty (especially the fairies! How dare they!), this film felt alive with its own lore and story. The acting was also much better especially from Michelle Pfeiffer and Elle Fanning who is actually given something to do as Aurora.


Unfortunately this is where my positives stop. Once we have our basic setup of Maleficent vs Pfeiffer the movie begins to falter. Where the dinner scene was surreal and strange, most of the remaining second half is a bland fantasy war movie. It reminded me of the war scene in Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland, which I hate, except it went on much longer. Despite being pretty, the story dragged, and Maleficent becomes a character who is acted upon more than she acts. Most of the time she is moping around waiting for other people to do things, so she can either sulk or acquiesce to their ideas.

I also was puzzled by the tone and audience Maleficent: Mistress of Evil (the title is so dumb by the way) is going for? The battle gets intense including a scene that is gas chamber-like for our heroes. I don’t think kids will find this entertaining nor are adults invested enough in the lore to be engrossed. I never watched Game of Thrones, but I know enough about it to spot the many times Hollywood has tried to capture the themes and aesthetics of that series, and this is definitely one of those films (there is even a long sequence with a dragon…)


It’s a real bummer because if they had kept the strange tone of the early scenes I could have had a surprise hit. I don’t even see why the war plotline is necessary? Why not have a movie about Aurora trying to plan a wedding with Maleficent and Pfeiffer bickering the whole time? That would have been amazing. As it is, we got a impressive looking war movie that loses its guts midway through.

I wanted to go fresh because I do appreciate the obvious attempt to improve upon the ‘Maleficent turning into the victim of a man’ nonsense of the original film, but that second half was too dull and derivative for me to recommend. Maybe give it a rental if curious? Otherwise, I’d say pass on this fairy story.

Frown Worthy

4.5 out of 10


13 thoughts on “[REVIEW] ‘Maleficent: Mistress of Evil’

  1. Huh, how interesting. I thought the first malificent movie was pretty…but not much beyond that. Sounds like the sequel isn’t worth bothering with either. Oh well. Thanks for the review! I really appreciate how you notice things like a character’s agency – how the “hero” (or villain) is making logical choices or simply reacting passively to others.

    1. Yeah I admire the swings it took but couldnt in the end recommend it. I appreciate your compliment because it was actually a hard review to write (always toughest when I’m in the middle on a movie rather than something I loved/hated). It makes me feel like I got the point across well.

  2. I did not enjoy the first one at all, so I was on the fence about seeing this one (I usually try to see every Disney movie to review for my blog…) But honestly life is really busy right now and given your review and my dislike of the previous one it doesn’t sound worth the time or money!

    1. Yeah maybe watch it as a rental because it is a strange movie or wait until it comes to Disney Plus

    1. It will definitely be interesting to see what you think. I bet you might find it a bit more boring than me

  3. I also got a “Game of Thrones” vibe from the muddled storyline. Maleficent: Mistress of Evil is even worse than its predecessor. Oh and the preponderance of CGI was an absolute abomination.

    1. Interesting. I can see preferring the first but I’d rather watch this one personally. It’s a little more bonkers and I hated the way the first treated the Sleeping Beauty story

      1. Really? I guess my peer group is weird because most I know seem to prefer this one 🤷‍♀️

      2. I still didnt go fresh on it but I’d rather watch something a little nuts and creative than something that bastardized a beloved classic

Leave a Reply